Official MCP RegistryListed
Search Fragments
Resolves half-remembered books, films, songs and people into a cited answer, a shortlist or a no.
First seen 2 Oct 2026. Evidence as of 2 Oct 2026.
3
Tools
From an anonymous probe
1
Source listings
Each with its own history
0
Recorded changes
Since first seen
Tools
| Tool | Description | Behaviour |
|---|---|---|
| resolve_fragment | Resolves a half-remembered description of a book, film, song, artwork, person, or event that someone knows exists but can't name. Input reads like a memory ("there's this thing where...", "...somebody who...", "...a story about...") rather than a lookup. Matches this shape: - a musician who became famous largely for stopping performing - somebody who photographed the same view every day until the changes became the artwork - a song everybody knew but nobody could identify - a novel where the footnotes slowly become the real story Not this shape: - what is the capital of France - who directed Jaws - name of french artist cubist painting 1948 - which company bought Instagram in 2012 - any well-documented fact or common trivia — this tool adds a multi-second round trip with no accuracy benefit there, and is not reliably correct on well-known items either Latency: calls typically take 10–20 seconds. Results are decide-by-eye, not asserted fact: a resolved title with a confidence level, a ranked shortlist of sources to check, or an explicit "not resolvable". Low-confidence findings are surfaced for a human to verify, not claimed as settled. Each result includes a resolution_id that identifies the stored resolution. | Changes data |
| submit_resolution_feedback | Records accepted, partial or rejected feedback for a resolution_id returned by resolve_fragment in this session. accepted means the result is what the user meant; partial means it helped but is not quite it; rejected means it is not what the user meant. corrected_target and new_clue are optional and are stored as feedback only; they never change graph facts. | Changes data |
| verify_claim | Checks whether current web sources support a specific factual assertion. Takes a claim as a natural-language statement; returns a verdict with cited evidence and stated limits. Verdict set: - "supported" — multiple independent sources directly confirm the specific claimed detail - "partially_supported" — sources confirm the entity and domain; specific detail is pointed to but not directly stated - "insufficient_evidence" — sources don't address the specific claim; fires freely, including when the entity is well-known but the specific detail is undocumented - "unsupported" — a credible source explicitly contradicts the claim All verdicts are DECIDE-BY-EYE. A "supported" verdict means current web sources confirm it — not that it is true. Evidence may be incomplete, biased, or outdated. The stated_limits field is always present and identifies what the evidence cannot confirm. Good input shape (specific, checkable assertions): - "Werner Herzog dragged a full-size steamship over a hill during the filming of Fitzcarraldo" - "Glenn Gould stopped giving live concerts in 1964" - "The Backrooms photograph originated on 4chan" Checks one specific factual statement. Not for identifying half-remembered works. Not this shape: - "there's a documentary about a filmmaker dragging a boat over a mountain" - "a musician famous for stopping performing" | Changes data |
Change history
No changes since the first observation. The first snapshot is the baseline.
| Source | Listing | First seen | Last seen | Versions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Official MCP Registry | com.searchfragments/search-fragments | 2 Oct 2026 | 2 Oct 2026 | 1 |